Bluefabric Multimedia
   
 
Archive Browser: 
   
 menu
 
Newsletter

Email Address:

Subscribe..
Privacy
In the Latest Issue

Preview: Germany 2006 (Part I)

Mike Holden introduces his Betting Zone preview to next month's summer festival of football by outlining his World Cup philosophy of what can make and break teams at such tournaments...

 

World Cup links

Punters thinking of getting stuck into some serious research ahead of this summer's World Cup may wish to use our links section as a central point of reference in the coming weeks...

 

The General Betting column

The concept of discipline, the relationship between gamblers and banks and the imaginary scenario of a week without Betfair were all discussed on the General Betting forum in April...

 

 

 

 

Cantor Spreadfair 1
Latest News

New Website!
Mon, 06 Jun 2005 13:17:44 GMT

p2pbetting.com – our new name
Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:58:15 GMT
Search site

quick links

ExchangeLogos.gif Cantor Spreadfair TradeBet XBetfairBetssonBetonBetBetdaqiBetx

  You are here:  Articles - 2004 - Mar - A fictional story about two professional gamblers
A fictional story about two professional gamblers

Bet Exchange News - March 2004

The following story was posted by Bobthebuilder on the Betfair General Betting Message Board and was universally hailed as a brilliant and incisive piece of writing that deserved a wider audience. So here we go, enjoy the story of Bob and Julian:

This is a completely fictional story about two professional gamblers, lets call them Bob & Julian, and the tax that they would currently pay.

Bob is a fan of betting exchanges. He enjoys betting there because of the lower margins, that he can back groups of selections easily by pressing the lay button, that he can trade and offset positions and that his account doesn't get closed down as soon as he backs three winners. Bob doesn't have any inside knowledge, but over time he wins more than he loses, and makes £20,000 a year betting on exchanges. Over the year he has paid £10,000 in commission to the exchange. The exchange pass on £1,500 in gross profits tax to the government directly from Bob's commission payments, and a further £1,500 in gross profits tax from commission payments of the people Bob has bet against.

By Bob betting on the exchange the government generates a total betting tax of £3,000 a year.

Julian doesn't like betting exchanges, he prefers the traditional bookmakers. As a racing insider, his account is kept open by the big bookmakers even though he is a winner. His insider information could be useful to them in deciding which horses can and cannot win, so they allow him to bet. With his insider knowledge Julian also makes £20,000 a year in betting. However he does not pay any commission payments, so none of his betting generates any tax for the government. In actual fact Julian's betting reduces the profits of the big bookmakers, and therefore reduces the governments betting tax by £3,000.

Bob is concerned that there is £6,000 difference in tax contributions between two people doing similar work and earning the same amount but thinks it is just one of those things in life and doesn't get upset by it.

Then one day he reads in the newspaper that the government wants a level playing field which sounds like a great idea. Imagine his surprise when finding out the government believe that the problem is not with the person taking £3,000 out of the tax system, but with exchange clients like himself who already pay into the system.

He wonders if this is not a palpable error?

The opinions expressed by contributors to this newsletter do not necessarily reflect the views of Bet Exchange News

 
Betfair 2
SportingLOT3
   
     
home Site Map Search Contact us